NV Kepler
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 21:33
- Location: Poland, Gdańsk
NV Kepler
Nvidia, upon the release of Kepler, is going to show off the new antialiasing method TXAA, which is suppose to be better than 16xMSAA at 1x and even better than 16xMSAA on 2x. Now, is it just me, or the antialiasing on the 8xMSAA is fake?
Anyway, what You think of it? What TXAA might stand for? Are You going to buy new Kepler GPU?
_________________
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17526
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: NV Kepler
It's one more fake. No one method of pseudo antialiasing is capable to be better than multisample antialiasing, because they work differently and applying to different areas. If you have thin lines of geometry (not the alpha test), then all fake methods like fxaa, smaa and anything else can't antialias it properly. They are good only as faster alternative to multisample antialiasing and where multisampled antialiasing not work (alpha test on textures, like fence f.e.). But of source ideal is supersampling antialiasing, nothing else better than it.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 21:33
- Location: Poland, Gdańsk
Re: NV Kepler
@ENBSeries
Well, since it's probably a temporal antialiasing, it use 2xMSAA to find the edges, so I think that it acctualy might be as good as 16xMSAA. Here's the link to the news, if You are interested: http://www.techpowerup.com/162504/NVIDI ... ailed.html
Well, since it's probably a temporal antialiasing, it use 2xMSAA to find the edges, so I think that it acctualy might be as good as 16xMSAA. Here's the link to the news, if You are interested: http://www.techpowerup.com/162504/NVIDI ... ailed.html
_________________
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor
-
Offline
- *sensei*
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 21:33
- Location: Poland, Gdańsk
Re: NV Kepler
_________________
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor
OS: Windows 10
CPU: AMD R5 3600
RAM: Corsair DDR4 16GB 3200MHz Vengeance
GPU: AMD Radeon 5700 XT
Sound Card: X-FI Titanium HD
Mobo: ASRock X370 Pro4
Monitor: M340CLZ 34" 3440x1440 100HZ AMD FREE Sync Curved Monitor