Please use english language
It is currently 24 Jul 2017, 14:39

All times are UTC





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: About realism in Skyrim
PostPosted: 12 Mar 2017, 17:56 
Offline

Joined: 28 Nov 2016, 19:43
Posts: 13
Fist of all I want to say the following post is a general rant on the common cliché I see around internet about skyrim, and I post it here just because is the only modding forum I joined.
So I hope not to offend anyone, is not my intention.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'm really really tired of the usual stereotypes on "realism" about the graphics on Skyrim.
In what kind of hell washed out colours and grayness represent nordic/cold country environments?
To be onest all the washed out colours just remind me a realistic bad pollution day on Beijing :D

Image

I see to much washed out preset tagged with name as "Uber Realistic/Super realistic!/Amazingly realistic!".
Well, they are not.
I'm not saying they are ugly or are bad preset, they can be beautifull.
And I'm not criticizing the work modders done, but we* should recognize them for what the preset are: fantasy, cinematic or artistic.
But more importantly we* should stop to say that more vivid preset are unrealistic or "too fantasy".
Realism or fantasy came from the good balance of colors, if they resemble the colors of real things they are realistic, otherwise they are fantasy or artistic.

*(The "we" is meant as the whole players comunity, and not "we" as member of this forum of course :P )

Just for example, since a photo can say more than thousand words, an actual photo of Norway (Probably the Nordic country more similar to skyrim):
https://pixabay.com/p-441867/
Image

Some other photos from wikimedia:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... ay-adj.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... y_Park.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... n_2009.JPG


Top
 Profile  
 
Tomoko
PostPosted: 12 Mar 2017, 18:34 
Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 13:42
Posts: 1984
Nice write-up, I completely agree.

I also agree in that's it's mostly simply a semantic issue, meaning that I think that many people who feel like a preset is "realistic" mean that it does a good job in imitating a cinematic style. In most cases this means washed out, desaturated colors, possibly a slight odd tint and low contrast, i.e. a style that's reminiscent of many "serious" contemporary movies. In my opinion it's not very "realistic" if we accept that realistic means how we see the world with our own eyes, only perhaps when considered as a portrayal of a video shot with an old low-quality video camera from the 80s or a movie shot with c-log or whatever, before any color grading.

But it's not really a problem I think, there are apples and oranges and as long as people are happy with that they've created that's great. Also, it would seem like most ENB preset creators are not afraid to use color, which is just awesome.

_________________
Smoking Torches and Candles
Dark Dungeons for ENB
Particle and Subsurface Scattering Patches for ENB (updated 11/01/2017)
flickr; twitter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 12 Mar 2017, 18:48 
Offline
*master*
User avatar

Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 20:38
Posts: 236
Location: Greece
Agreed it's a trend i fell victim too or more accurately i should say i contributed to it aswell :D , realistic was or will be eventually be replaced by "photorealistic" which in my opinion is better but also wrong because the look changes dramatically between cameras so it's kinda all nonsense in the end. So we can conclude it's mostly done for a better sale pitch that will catch a user's attention because at some point we all look for the "realistic" look without actually knowing what that means and we settle for "that is close enough".

_________________
ImageImage
/ Youtube Channel / Music Channel /
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC 2gb vram RAM: Kingston DDR2 8gb Disk Drive: SSD Mushkin 120gb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 04:02 
Offline
*blah-blah-blah maniac*
User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
Posts: 11193
Location: St.Petersburg
I had lot of quarrel with users about this. Most people seems see no difference, it's like blind can't see and no matter how hard you try, can't explain how things looks like, obvious to one is strange and abnormal for another.

_________________
Core i5-4690K 3.5 GHz, 16 Gb ram, GeForce 650 Ti 2 Gb, X-Fi Xtreme Music, WinXP/Win7
I am INFP, not the brutal, godamnit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 20:50 
Offline

Joined: 28 Nov 2016, 19:43
Posts: 13
Thanks to all for the interesting replies :)

Fully agree with you mindflux that is mostly a semantic issue, but sometimes the name or the description is misleading and perpetuate this inaccurate preconception :(
More than the movie appearance I fear the main "culprit" is the vanilla appearance, who many associate with cold environments without understanding that the developer chose the vanilla palette to try to give to the game a grim and dramatic fantasy atmosphere, more than a realistic appearance.

Of course there's nothing wrong with liking this kind of atmosphere, but I don't like when is considered the "official realistic cold environment" and more balanced palettes are tagged as "less realistic" or even fantasy!

mindflux wrote:
as long as people are happy with that they've created that's great.

Agree, the best things about modding is that we can make the game to look how we like, and this is always great.
The variety of presets available for ENB is more than welcome! :D

mindflux wrote:
Also, it would seem like most ENB preset creators are not afraid to use color, which is just awesome.

They have all my respect! :D

LucidAPs wrote:
realistic was or will be eventually be replaced by "photorealistic" which in my opinion is better but also wrong because the look changes dramatically between cameras so it's kinda all nonsense in the end.

True, you have absolutely a point here! :) I also think that photorealism deserve its own definition in respect to "naked eye" realism, even if the difference is more subtle compared to cinematic or artistic filters (But if is difficult for skyrim player learning the difference from realistic and fantasy, try to explain the difference from realistic and photorealistic would be an herculean effort! :P )
I really like some photo/lens filters, for example I love effects like chromatic aberration even if is not "naked eye" realistic.
For the "better sale pitch" I think you are right, nothing really serious and probably done in good faith due to the common misconception about realism.

ENBSeries wrote:
I had lot of quarrel with users about this. Most people seems see no difference, it's like blind can't see and no matter how hard you try, can't explain how things looks like, obvious to one is strange and abnormal for another.

Agree, I think most of them are probably in good faith, but there's always someone that just keep defending his idea, even after seeing his argument is wrong, just not to admit his mistake.
Is a little sad when it happens. Except when are haters/trolls, in that case slapping a good comparison picture under their nose can be satisfactory :ugeek: :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2017, 08:58 
Offline

Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:52
Posts: 1
Those mods make Skyrim more realistic while at the same time improve the mechanics. I played there more than once. It's easy to win real money with free slots at 777extraslot.com in no deposit games. All you need is to register in order to gamble and benefit from awesome bonus features!


Last edited by Harry Southall on 14 Jun 2017, 06:10, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2017, 16:55 
Offline
*sensei*

Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 10:29
Posts: 490
Location: Taiwan
@Lastblade

CA in your demo pic ( top left corner in the first wiki demo pic you linked )
Image

also, you can see CA if you wear glasses.

"overcast" look is what most those desaturated preset are aiming for, but ofc it should be weather dependent.

_________________
Intel Xeon L5639 6C12T @3.96GHz // Gigabyte ga-x58a-ud3r// MSI GTX680 4G// 24G RAM
Flickr
YouTube


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group