ENBs missing most of the effects
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
It is not Win10 issue, because only crapware, video driver, some razor/logitek drivers, reshade/sweetfx (?) are known for using dx11 libraries for no reason. I do not support any third party graphic mods, so can't say anything about them, but better to not use them, it's just wasting of vram and performance while enbseries is much more powerful.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 11:55
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Gotcha. I have one last question for you, which binary is better to use with a preset that uses for example 0.266 or 0.279 since they are no longer hosted here? I heard that the newest one is heavier, so would be better to use 0.262?ENBSeries wrote:It is not Win10 issue, because only crapware, video driver, some razor/logitek drivers, reshade/sweetfx (?) are known for using dx11 libraries for no reason. I do not support any third party graphic mods, so can't say anything about them, but better to not use them, it's just wasting of vram and performance while enbseries is much more powerful.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Ideal version is next available for download after version which is "required" by preset. I keep versions only if they have important changes for presets, but all 0.2xx are compatible with 0.305 (very old 0.1xx may not work properly for some effects without manual tweaking). Recent version is not slower than older.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 02 Jul 2013, 19:24
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
I had the same issue, and just the "dxgi.dll" from the System32 folder did the trick.
_________________
Intel Core i7 4770K
NVIDIA GTX 680 4GB
Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Creative SoundBlaster ZxR
Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 16GB
Crucial M4 256GB
2x WD Blue 1TB 2,5"
Seasonic Platinum 760
Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Intel Core i7 4770K
NVIDIA GTX 680 4GB
Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Creative SoundBlaster ZxR
Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 16GB
Crucial M4 256GB
2x WD Blue 1TB 2,5"
Seasonic Platinum 760
Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
-
Offline
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 23 Apr 2016, 10:04
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
You need to roll back to driver 355.60 or earlier in Win 10 if you need ENB to work with AO, detail shadow, DOF and SSS. Any driver later than that will miss effects above.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 23:06
- Location: New Hampshire, US
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Um no you don't. I am on 364.72 and it works fine. Some folks have better stability with 355 but it certainly isn't required to run ENB. I know plenty of folks who are using win10 with ENB and current Nvidia drivers. Maybe you are having issues but its not global by any means. Now sweetFx/ReShade has some issues for many folks running on win10 and Skyrim with SFX effects not working fully.anitman wrote:You need to roll back to driver 355.60 or earlier in Win 10 if you need ENB to work with AO, detail shadow, DOF and SSS. Any driver later than that will miss effects above.
Never heard of ENB effects not working though. Maybe you have some other issue creating a conflict. Make sure you are not using GeoForce Experience or the steam overlay.
_________________
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Nobody knows for sure yet. Could be different per videocard model. For me new drivers do not work at all in games i modify, without mod and it's Win7. In the past i had experience when even the same videocard models had different artifacts because their vendors are different and internal ID too.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 23 Apr 2016, 10:04
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Well, I'm not saying that ENB is not totally working with 364.72, but surely missing some effects such as SSS and detailed shadow, I have proofs:wolfgrimdark wrote:Um no you don't. I am on 364.72 and it works fine. Some folks have better stability with 355 but it certainly isn't required to run ENB. I know plenty of folks who are using win10 with ENB and current Nvidia drivers. Maybe you are having issues but its not global by any means. Now sweetFx/ReShade has some issues for many folks running on win10 and Skyrim with SFX effects not working fully.anitman wrote:You need to roll back to driver 355.60 or earlier in Win 10 if you need ENB to work with AO, detail shadow, DOF and SSS. Any driver later than that will miss effects above.
Never heard of ENB effects not working though. Maybe you have some other issue creating a conflict. Make sure you are not using GeoForce Experience or the steam overlay.
The screenshot showing the above is taken with 355.60
Below is taken under 364.72 with same other settings
You could see the slight differences of the shadow and shader between each two drivers, bloom works Ok, but SSS and detailed shadow are both missing. FPS is better in 364.72 because of the missing effects.
BTW, I'm not with any crap ware such as GE and SO.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17427
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
These changes are actually very big, depth is not captured properly. Most of the mod features do not work.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 506
- Joined: 02 Aug 2013, 23:06
- Location: New Hampshire, US
Re: ENBs missing most of the effects
Ah I misunderstood, thanks for the clarifications and screenshots.anitman wrote: ...
You could see the slight differences of the shadow and shader between each two drivers, bloom works Ok, but SSS and detailed shadow are both missing. FPS is better in 364.72 because of the missing effects.
BTW, I'm not with any crap ware such as GE and SO.
_________________
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144
Intel Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.6 GHz // GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VRAM 11GB // Win10 64 and 64GB Ram // Monitor 2560x1440@144