G'day, Boris... version 315 did not help my card, possibly made it worse.
Could you tell me where to find the versions between 292 and 314? It might help to know where the actual issue started, and testing that will be fairly easy. I know that there was a 308, and a 310? However, I can not find where to D/L them.
BTW, Nvidia tosses new releases out now like McDonald's flips over burgers... Every new game, a new release.
Saying that, I think I know where to get older Nvidia releases, so I could also work backwards with their drivers too.
I'll sketch out a test plan this eve.
New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
- Author
- Message
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
It can't make things worse, because there are no changes made to enboost part or any performance parts of the code. Attached versions created after 0.292 till 0.308. But it doesn't help, there is nothing i can do about them if driver have hint for 0.292
EDIT: file deleted
EDIT: file deleted
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 03 Jul 2017, 11:53
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
Possibly I'll find nothing. But, I might be able to say which one was the first to break after .292. Then, depending on your notes and testing, it might point the way to some piece of code... Yes, probably an exercise in tail-chasing.ENBSeries wrote:It can't make things worse, because there are no changes made to enboost part or any performance parts of the code. Attached versions created after 0.292 till 0.308. But it doesn't help, there is nothing i can do about them if driver have hint for 0.292
Could I also have 308 and 310?
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
First check these attached, because 0.308 you have tested already according to previous posts.
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 03 Jul 2017, 11:53
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
301 and 302 act like 292. 303 up act like 314.
So, whatever you did in 303....
Have there been any other complaints of win 7 /1080 ti users? If not, then this is truly flogging a dead horse. Not that I am dead, (or a horse) but you get the meaning.
So, whatever you did in 303....
Have there been any other complaints of win 7 /1080 ti users? If not, then this is truly flogging a dead horse. Not that I am dead, (or a horse) but you get the meaning.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
Check attached version
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
-
Offline
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 03 Jul 2017, 11:53
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
Currently Steam's bootstrap is broken, so I cannot test. I'll let you know as soon as they get their bootstrap fixed.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
-
Offline
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 03 Jul 2017, 11:53
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
New test version I'll call 303_test worked just fine. Of course I don't know what that means, but I hope that it is useful information for you.
-
Offline
- *blah-blah-blah maniac*
- Posts: 17436
- Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 08:53
- Location: Rather not to say
Re: New test ENB v0.315 and 1080 Ti
It means that you must listen what i say instead of making new forum topic.
Code: Select all
[THREADS]
DataSyncMode=0
PriorityMode=0
EnableUnsafeFixes=false
_________________
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7
i9-9900k, 64Gb RAM, RTX 3060 12Gb, Win7